PivotRisk brings risk intelligence, practical tools, and experienced guidance into one approach, built by a practitioner and priced for real teams, so trust takes less work to earn.
Type in an office, data center, or supplier address for a risk score from live hazard, cloud, and geopolitical feeds, each source named. Free to use, or paid with your estate on it.
Ready-made spreadsheets and documents for the jobs every risk program has: a list of risks, a continuity plan, a vendor review. Built to hold up under scrutiny.
Browse the toolsHands-on help designing or fixing your program, from a practitioner who has run these programs from the inside: resilience, location risk, operating models. It starts with a conversation.
Start a conversationJust exploring? The knowledge base is free: practical articles from inside real risk programs. Read the articles
Storm warnings, earthquakes, cloud outages, country advisories: the information is already published, scattered across dozens of sources nobody has time to watch. Put it on one map, next to your own offices and suppliers, and it stops being noise and starts being a picture.
Live feeds from the agencies that publish them: hazards, cloud region health, outages, advisories. Each one named and dated, so you can see where it came from.
Your offices, data centers, suppliers, and backup sites, placed against those signals instead of sitting in a separate spreadsheet.
Which of your locations sit inside what is happening right now, and where you are more concentrated than you realized. That overlap is the part no list can show you.
Seeing all of it at once takes a map, not another column in a spreadsheet. That map is running below, live and free to use.
Nothing loads until you press the button. Then each feed is fetched straight from the publishing agency to your browser, no PivotRisk server in the path, and nothing stored.
One watch screen for storms, outages, and advisories, each item named and dated, so the brief can cite its source.
A screening score on a 5×5 likelihood and impact scale, with the arithmetic in view.
With your estate on it, the private build runs as a living BIA and dependency analysis.
This public map is the working prototype, free to use, and it stays that way. Geospatial intelligence is an active investment area for the practice: the map keeps growing with customer feedback and best-practice research, and clients who engage now shape where it goes next. The paid engagement is the private build, the same console with your estate integrated, event monitoring and alerts for your teams, delivered on a platform that meets your security and privacy requirements.
Most governance programs are built around frameworks. The ones that perform are built around operating models: clear ownership, defined workflows, and governance structures that reflect how the organization actually makes decisions. When an examiner asks who decides what, the answer should be one page, not a meeting. This is where PivotRisk spends most of its time.
Every template here is built for a moment of scrutiny: the rating an auditor challenges, the control mapping an examiner pulls, the continuity plan someone opens at 2am. Twenty years of program work, in workbooks that connect to each other, so a risk, its controls, and its recovery plan stay one lookup apart instead of three separate files.
Practitioner writing on the decisions, structures, and operating choices that make GRC programs perform, not just produce documents.
You can have the best control library in the industry and still underperform. Here's why the operating model determines whether governance actually works.
Every major regulatory framework says roughly the same thing. Most programs still fall apart in a real incident. The frameworks aren't the problem.
Most board risk reports are written to inform. The best ones are written to decide. That distinction sounds subtle. The operational difference is significant.
Security teams have been saying security is a business enabler for years. The ones where it's actually true built a Customer Trust function and treated it like a sales asset.
The framework isn't wrong, but leading with it almost guarantees you'll build something that looks like a compliance program instead of a risk management program.
There's a lot of noise about AI transforming GRC. Most of it is vendor marketing. Here's what I've actually found useful, and where the hype is still running ahead of reality.